[ Home | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]
From: ourinfo
Date: 10/16/2005
Time: 12:05:27 PM
Remote Name: 219.148.146.99
http://www.seole.com.cn Google排名 http://www.by737.com 服务器合租 http://www.by737.net 数据恢复 http://www.liu-he-cai.org 六合彩 http://www.liu-he-cai.org 香港六合彩 http://www.14448.com 六合彩 http://www.14448.com 香港六合彩 http://liuhecai.50webs.com 六合彩 http://liuhecai.50webs.com 香港六合彩 http://liuhecai.99inch.com 六合彩 http://liuhecai.99inch.com 香港六合彩 http://liuhecai1.99inch.com 六合彩 http://liuhecai1.99inch.com 香港六合彩 http://liuhecai2.99inch.com 六合彩 http://liuhecai2.99inch.com 香港六合彩
From: Ian
Date: 9/27/01
Time: 8:59:34 PM
Remote Name: 64.12.101.181
If you have an allotment of surface water that you cannot currently use and you would like to do some kind of water banking, than a recharge and recovery system will serve your purpose. They are however very large expensive projects. I see no point in building a system if you will recover as much as you infiltrate. The investigations that I have seen show that current treatment methods such as filters, GAC, and ozone are much cheaper and more effective than the filtering gained through recharge. After extensive operation of a recharge project, you will find that the recovered water has almost the same chemical signature that it had when it was infiltrated. All you have achieved is the removal of suspended solids. Treatment can be done locally where the water is needed, and the problem of capital investment required in recovering and transporting the water to and from the project site can be used for state of the art treatment.